Hi
Mark Rivers (rivers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) asks:
> Are there any plans to add data compression to netCDF? We are strongly
> leaning towards switching from our present (local) data file format to
> netCDF. The only feature which we will have to give up is data
> compression. We are presently using either run-length encoding or a simple
> form of linear predictive coding. Both of these are loss-free. Linear
> predictive coding typically reduces the size of our 32 bit integer data
> files by a factor of 3, which is significant.
>
> It seems like it could be a very worthwhile addition.
We have no plans to add data compression to netCDF (although we do plan to
eventually add a form of data packing previously described on this mailing
list).
Implementing hyperslab access and direct access to individual array values
become considerably more complicated if compression is to be supported.
Consider how you might devise any effective compression scheme if the
elements of an array variable can be filled in any order or as
cross-sections in any direction. NetCDF permits writing elements in one
order and reading them later in differnet orders.
Some compression methods require that all the data to be compressed are
known before starting the compression. Techniques like run-length encoding
or anything that depends on exploiting similarities in nearby values can't
be used if nearby values aren't all known at the time some of the data are to
be written.
An alternative that can be implemented above the netCDF library is to adopt
a convention for compressed data that uses a "compression" attribute to
encode the method of compression, e.g.
x:compression = "rle" ;
for run-length encoding of the data in a variable x. Then when you write
the data, compress them into a bland array of bytes and write all the bytes.
Note that it would be difficult to define the size of such a variable in
advance, since its compressed size depends on its values. You would also
have to give up on hyperslab access for such variables, but instead read the
compressed array in all at once and uncompress it before using it.
--Russ
