Daryl,
>Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:38:56 -0600 (CST)
>From: Daryl Herzmann <akrherz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: David Wojtowicz <davidw@xxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: 20031111: motherlode inaccessibility
The above message contained the following:
> I am curious why you use the 'old'(?) failover method of participating in
> the IDD via ldmfail or manual failover. I am using the 'PRIMARY' and
> 'SECONDARY' keywords in my ldmd.conf and LDM handled the thelma outage
> just fine AFAIK.. (Very nice UNIDATA!, btw)
Thanks. It's good to know it worked.
You might look at
http://dev.unidata.ucar.edu/content/software/ldm/ldm-6.0.14/basics/tradeoffs.html
for more information on the tradeoffs between robustness, latency, and
load.
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
