NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
Hi, An alternative proposal would be to do away with the list of formats and encode all information about the coverage in GML - the accompanying binary file could then be in any format you want, but would be read ONLY for the range (i.e. "pixel") values. Cheers Ron
From: owner-galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ben Domenico Sent: March 6, 2006 7:45 PM To: GALEON email list Subject: Fwd: Another netCDF discussion at OGC meetings Hi GALEON participants, As it turns out, there is interest in addressing the issue of a netCDF "profile" for netCDF directly during the WCS Revision Working Group meeting Wednesday morning at the OGC technical committee meetings here in Huntsville. John Evans has set up a session starting at 10 am central time on that topic. His note below gives the particulars. The idea is basically to do away with the list of WCS encoding formats and allow any format that has an appropriate "profile" specified. The question of course is what that profile is to consist of. As most of you know, after the last meeting, we started working on a draft which is available at: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/projects/THREDDS/GALEON/WCSnetCDFencoding.htm It is clearly a work in progress, but can serve as the basis for starting the discussion. I know some of you GALEON participants can't be here in person, but John Evans has arranged for a telecon hookup as indicated in his note below. This should complement our GALEON discussions Wednesday afternoon. -- Ben
galeon archives: