RE: Thoughts on GALEON Phase 2

• To: <Simon.Cox@xxxxxxxx>, <gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx>, <rhusar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: RE: Thoughts on GALEON Phase 2
• From: "Ron Lake" <rlake@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:55:35 -0800

Hi,

Yes - I would say a "language to build languages" - but a tool kit to
build languages is good too. So this makes GML quite different than
SensorML or CSML - as they are end use application languages.  So super
setting GML is the normal practice.

Ron

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Simon.Cox@xxxxxxxx
Sent: February 28, 2006 2:29 PM
To: gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx; rhusar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Thoughts on GALEON Phase 2

But please note that GML is *not* a language - it is a toolkit for building 
languages. CSML is one such GML APplication language. SensorML is not ... yet, 
but ought to be!

Simon