NetCDF-Fortran 4.4.0

Version 4.4.0 of the netCDF-Fortran library is now available.

Some highlights of the 4.4.0 release:

  • For 32-bit platforms fixed integer fill parameters, initialized potentially unitialized variables, and provided some missing defaults (Thanks to R. Weed).
  • Fixed CMake builds on 32-bit platforms.
  • Added new inq_path and rename_grps functions analogous to corresponding C functions. Added associated tests. (Thanks to R. Weed)
  • Added support for NF_MPIIO, NF_MPIPOSIX, NF_PNETCDF flags and NF_FILL_UINT. (Thanks to R. Weed)
  • Fixed potential bug in attribute functions for integer values when Fortran INTEGER*1 or INTEGER*2 types are the same size as C long. (Thanks to R. Weed)
  • Added test for compiler support of Fortran 2008 ISO_FORTRAN_ENV additions and TS29113 standard extension.
  • Fixed C_PTR_DIFF_T issue reported by Orion Poplowski. (Thanks to R. Weed)

Since our initial move to github, we’ve refined our release process using the netCDF-C project. Hopefully this has helped minimize the issues introduced in this, our first full netCDF-Fortran release hosted on github.

Source-code zip and tar.gz archives can be found on Unidata's netCDF-Fortran GitHub site.

Detailed information about the release is available in the Release Notes.

Additional documentation:

Comments:

thank you

Posted by Anita Grezio on July 30, 2014 at 02:25 AM MDT #

student

Posted by hanghai on July 31, 2014 at 01:49 AM MDT #

ok

Posted by ali on August 02, 2014 at 10:22 PM MDT #

Reminds me how I started with FORTRAN and Assembler (and machine-code macros) in the 1970s and how FORTRAN's demise was scheduled year after year. Computing time was scarce and costly, cards had to be punched and a mistake took forever to find and correct. Already then I had a suspicion that the huge amount of code based on FORTRAN would rather make further evolution of FORTRAN a better option than "reinventing the wheel" and this proves true by now. Thanks to your and all the open source efforts - generations of students can just concentrate on getting things done rather than running their schedules around the availability of a card puncher and waiting in queue for their "job" to run.

Posted by Colm Barry on August 10, 2014 at 07:15 AM MDT #

thank you

Posted by Yao-Wang on September 11, 2014 at 04:54 AM MDT #

good, thank you

Posted by chenhui on September 29, 2014 at 02:39 AM MDT #

thanks

Posted by Ozge Yilmaz on October 12, 2014 at 03:10 PM MDT #

thank you

Posted by vasilis on October 24, 2014 at 07:44 AM MDT #

building WRF3.4.1

Posted by toan on November 17, 2014 at 09:37 AM MST #

thank you

Posted by 222.195.137.214 on November 19, 2014 at 07:43 PM MST #

Thanks

Posted by Luqian Jiang on July 19, 2015 at 08:07 PM MDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: Allowed
News@Unidata
News and information from the Unidata Program Center
News@Unidata
News and information from the Unidata Program Center

Welcome

FAQs

Developers’ blog

Recent Entries:
Take a poll!

What if we had an ongoing user poll in here?

Browse By Topic
Browse by Topic
« August 2017
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
  
       
Today