<rights policy="display"> The following data and products ... </rights>
Ethan Davis wrote:
Benno Blumenthal wrote:
This is a tough issue because THREDDS is more of an information transmission protocol than a client.John Caron wrote:
thats an interesting issue. i suppose we can add an optional attribute to the documentation element, like mustNotify="true" which means to clients that they should pop up the contents of the documentation element and have the user press "Accept". Do you think that would suffice?
I want to say yes, something like that would work, but that supposes,
1) all THREDDS clients would do the right thing, and
2) all DODS/OPenDAP/WCS/ADDE clients would display the restrictions in the THREDDS catalog.
1) is possible at this stage of THREDDS, I think, but 2) seems pretty unlikely. It would really take a communal commitment to this sort of thing to make it work, and I am not sure the interest is really there. The alternative is for me to set up user names and passwords so that I (as the original server) can take care of challenging the user using HTTP and then allowing the user to use the data. Not my favorite solution, but at least it works.
Since the clients in 2) have to be THREDDS clients to access THREDDS catalogs, seems this collapses into just 1). I agree that 1) might be possible at this stage but it is not containable so could change at any time without our knowledge.
We've certainly wrestled with this issue before and not really gotten very far. To my mind, THREDDS can "provide" this information (if it is in the catalog, the client will read it); however, it can't enforce the acknowledgement of or even ensure that anything is done with the information. If that is required then the clients and/or servers must have some control mechanism and policy in place (whether highly restrictive or lightly).
I think there are things THREDDS as a protocol can do to support access controlled systems and THREDDS as a project can do to provide or encourage access controlled systems. But I don't see how THREDDS can enforce this kind of thing. It is up to the data providers to make sure that their systems (and the clients that are accessing them) adhere to the requied policies.
I realize THREDDS is mostly about freely exchanged data, and restricted data is OK too because the underlying data server is responsible for restricting access to the data. But there is another class of data which required display of some agreement as a condition for use.
The classic example is WMO40, the key phrase being "must provide this same notification" ,e.g.
*The following data and products may have conditions placed on their international commercial use. They can be used within the U.S. or for non-commercial international activities without restriction. Re-distribution of these data by others must provide this same notification. A log of IP addresses accessing these data and products will be maintained and may be made available to data providers. *
*For details, please consult: *
-- Ethan R. Davis Telephone: (303) 497-8155 Software Engineer Fax: (303) 497-8690 UCAR Unidata Program Center E-mail: address@hidden P.O. Box 3000 Boulder, CO 80307-3000 http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.