Re: text versions for using the NSDL Communication Portal
- To: Ben Domenico <address@hidden>
- Subject: Re: text versions for using the NSDL Communication Portal
- From: Tom Whittaker <address@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 09:23:49 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
I sure agree about Word and PP -- that's why I try to use StarOffice for
such things. Just for grins, I opened Chris' Word file in SO and then
just saved it as HTML -- the result is at:
The HTML is not too onerous.
But, actually, I was hoping to promote document preparation in HTML.
Just as you, I find converting between formats to often produces
"interesting" results, whereas simple HTML is nowadays pretty universal.
Now if I could only convince NSF/Fastlane (although I see that PDF is
not the only format available these days...HTML still is not).
[Although I note this is the same line of thinking that caused me to
speak out about "point data" at the meeting, so maybe I already made my
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Ben Domenico wrote:
> The only problem I have with HTML is with the particular flavor generated
> by Microsoft Word and PowerPoint. Actually the newer (Mac) version seems
> to do a better job, but Word 2000 generates impenetrable HTML. Those are
> the cases where we prefer to create PDFs. We're looking into whether Word
> XP does a better job of creating web pages.
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Space Science and Eng. Center
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the
Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available
through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made
available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.