Hi Orion,
Thanks, I committed your patches plus added --has-f03 to nf-config
options to indicate when the Fortran-2003 interoperability feature was
used to support the f90 API. Without this, the --has-f90=no seems to
indicate that the F90 API is not supported, which is not he case when the
Fortran-2003 build was used.
As for the last issue you raised, I'm thinking it would be best to just have
--flibs and delete --libs from the nf-config options to avoid the
confusion. However, I haven't done that yet ...
--Russ
> A couple of related issues with nf-config and netcdf-fortran.pc:
>
> - For static linking, netcdf-fortran.pc should provide:
>
> Libs.private: -L${libdir} -lnetcdff -lnetcdf
>
> - nf-config --flags should not return the compiler flags used to compile
> netcdf-fortran. On Fedora for example, all kinds of extra flags are
> added that end-users may or may not want.
>
> - Having nf-config have both a --libs and a --flibs options seems
> confusing, especially with nf-config --libs returning -lnetcdf. Not
> sure the best way forward on this though.
>
> I've attached a patch for the first two changes.
>
> --
> Orion Poplawski
> Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
> NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
> 3380 Mitchell Lane address@hidden
> Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
>
>
Russ Rew UCAR Unidata Program
address@hidden http://www.unidata.ucar.edu
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: TWS-325985
Department: Support netCDF
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.