> address@hidden> wrote: > > > Shortly after that, if we encounter no unanticipated problems, we'll be > > releasing > > a netcdf-fortran that also includes CMake build configurations, at least > > for ifort > > (we don't have the resources to test and support multiple Fortran > > compilers on > > Windows). > > > That's good to hear. Intel's Fortran compiler would work for me as well; I > was trying MinGW because I read that's what you used to make the current > Windows DLL. I guess I'll pay attention to your news blog for a release > announcement (or is there somewhere else I should be looking for the news?) > Do you plan to have any release candidates before the final release? Yes, we'll have a netcdf-4.3-beta1, or maybe netcdf-4.3-rc1, depending on our level of confidence with the release and local testing. The current Windows DLL's we distribute are now actually based on our CMake build with Visual Studio: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/win_netcdf/ --Russ Russ Rew UCAR Unidata Program address@hidden http://www.unidata.ucar.edu Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: ACB-881122 Department: Support netCDF Priority: Normal Status: Closed
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.