[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions about rfc dataset

On 2/18/2012 12:52 PM, Jordan Walker wrote:
On 02/17/2012 07:45 PM, John Caron wrote:
On 2/17/2012 4:55 PM, Jordan Walker wrote:
We came across an issue with how OPeNDAP is handling one of the variables (1-hour Quantitative Precip Estimate) in the RFC dataset. It seems that via OPeNDAP there is way to subset the data, but only get the entire variable. It works fine through cdmremote, and the other variable seems to be doing well. Any clue what is going on here?
No, can you send me the URL thats failing?


Which I would think would bring back one value, but apparently does not.

it seems to be returning a 403. anyway a bug we will get fixed.

Also, now that you have ironed out the grib issues a bit, should we move ahead with serving up this dataset from our end? This is highly sought after data for one of our projects, and they are working on the plan for using this data going forward.

The variable names are all going to change (probably), so you will have to deal with that if you start using it now. Otherwise, its probably pretty stable, but some weeks before we can move it to our production server.

We can deal with changes to this data. Would it make sense for us to target motherlode as a realtime server and start building up an archive on our end?

yeah, if you want an archive you should start accumulating. we can get a TDS on it as soon as that's stable.


NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.