[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[netCDF #LTA-465932]: CF/Radial

Hi Ross,

> I am working of generating NetCDF files from radar data (ray-based
> volumes, ray-base and Cartesian products, cross-sections, etc.).
> For our ray-based data, it appears that the proposed CF/Radial format
> would be ideal.  As this is quite new, I can see that there is no
> on-line compliance checker, and I haven't seen any evidence of groups
> considering this format.
> Can you give me a sense of whether anybody in the radar/lidar community
> is making a move to embrace this format yet?

Yes, I think there is a growing community using it.  There is also a mailing
list on which you can ask about it:

> Also, if I produce files using CF/Radial, is there somebody who can work
> with me to see if my files are compliant?

I'm not sure what the compliance-checker plans are, but I'll bet someone on
the cfradial-users mailing list knows.


Russ Rew                                         UCAR Unidata Program
address@hidden                      http://www.unidata.ucar.edu

Ticket Details
Ticket ID: LTA-465932
Department: Support netCDF
Priority: High
Status: Closed

NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.