[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[netCDF #RFM-852616]: cdm validator

it would be useful to have a file with real data in it, correctly projected, so 
we can test if the projection is correct.

> Great. Monday I will supply you with a file.
> We do have a valid example of lambert_azimuthal_equal_area
> which failed the cdm validator.
> 
> I believe that the data was not been reprojected ( to
> lambert_conformal_conic) in the file that eventually
> passed the cdm validator test.  The only
> thing that changed was the projection information variable
> and its attributes. It was done to test that it was
> the projection that was not validating.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sue
> 
> > We intend to support all CF projections, but only add them when we have a
> > valid example. Are you reprojecting these files as you change the
> > projection, or only changing the projection info? IE, what projection do
> > you want to use?
> >
> > Docs on what we support are at:
> >
> >   
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/reference/StandardCoordinateTransforms.html
> >
> > please let me know if you have an example that doesnt work according to
> > the docs.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: RFM-852616
> > Department: Support THREDDS
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Open
> >
> 
> 
> 


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: RFM-852616
Department: Support THREDDS
Priority: Normal
Status: Open