>From: Richard Massa <address@hidden> >Organization: UC Davis >Keywords: 200210150109.g9F19F112387 McIDAS-XCD LDM Hi Richard, re: builds of -X and -XCD on atm20 with different compiler environments >I did... I saw a segmentation violation in the START_XCD.LOG file and >I decided I would try rebuild, and when a rebuild with the -g77 didn't work, >I figured I would try the gcc/f2c/mcfc option instead. Neither fixed the >problem. I am curious about the command "rebuild with the -g77 didn't work". I just built the entire distribution from scratch using the VENDOR=-g77 option and it worked without a hitch. >Ahh... I did make clean, and since it did something, I assumed that cleaned up >the build. Now I know for future reference. Yea, the 'clobber' action deletes all of the stuff created from previous builds. >So VENDOR=-g77 is the preferred method of building? It is the method that I am pushing. After all, I didn't spend all of those hours fixing McIDAS Fortran subroutines so that g77 could work for nothing ;-) FYI, I had to modify about 100 modules to get g77 to build working code. The problem was the implicit assumption that variables declared in subroutines were automatically zeroed. This is the case for most vendor compilers, but not for g77. >Thank's for the troubleshooting... No worries. >I'm halfway glad it wasn't something terribly easy. I'm not :-( >I'll look at permissions as well. Sounds good. Tom
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.