>From: weather <address@hidden> >Organization: NMSU/NSBF >Keywords: 199909242206.QAA23500 McIDAS-XCD DMGRID AVN grid missing SC5.0 Robert, Some promising number from the 0 and 12 Z AVN runs for 2000121: machine dataset #MERC #PS Total OSystem Compilers --------------+---------------+------+------+------+--------+--------- adde.unidata RTGRIDS/AVN.10 1580 x86 SC5.0 wxmcidas.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.10 1580 x86 SC5.0 windfall.evsc RTGRIDS/AVN.10 1580 SPARC SC4.2 psnldm.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.10 1580 SPARC SC5.0 adde.unidata RTGRIDS/AVN.20 1009 x86 SC5.0 wxmcidas.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.20 1009 x86 SC5.0 windfall.evsc RTGRIDS/AVN.20 1009 SPARC SC4.2 psnldm.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.20 1009 SPARC SC5.0 adde.unidata RTGRIDS/AVN.30 760 x86 SC5.0 wxmcidas.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.30 760 x86 SC5.0 windfall.evsc RTGRIDS/AVN.30 760 SPARC SC4.2 psnldm.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.30 760 SPARC SC5.0 adde.unidata RTGRIDS/AVN.40 1587 x86 SC5.0 wxmcidas.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.40 1587 x86 SC5.0 windfall.evsc RTGRIDS/AVN.40 1587 SPARC SC4.2 psnldm.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.40 1587 SPARC SC5.0 adde.unidata RTGRIDS/AVN.50 1009 x86 SC5.0 wxmcidas.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.50 1009 x86 SC5.0 windfall.evsc RTGRIDS/AVN.50 1009 SPARC SC4.2 psnldm.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.50 1009 SPARC SC5.0 adde.unidata RTGRIDS/AVN.60 760 x86 SC5.0 wxmcidas.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.60 760 x86 SC5.0 windfall.evsc RTGRIDS/AVN.60 760 SPARC SC4.2 psnldm.nsbf RTGRIDS/AVN.60 760 SPARC SC5.0 So, one of three possibilities exist for the current decoding success: o the version of dmgrid.k from stratus.al works better than the one built on psnldm o psnldm getting fed from wxmcidas works better than other feeds o there has been less volume in the IDD so that RECLASS messages indicating loss of data are not seen In any case, I must conclude that the decoding of grids by XCD is working correctly. This fits with your last communication: >From address@hidden Fri Apr 28 16:20:10 2000 >I think I see the problem. I was getting RECLASS statements in my >ldmd.log when these partial grids occurred. My usual problems. >Is a T1 really not a fat enough pipe? As the amount of gridded data in the IDD increases, the size of the pipe needs to increase IF one wants to get all of the data all of the time. This problem will be magnified even more when we begin increasing the volume of image data in the Unidata-Wisconsin datastream. >Does everyone else have multiple T1's or T3's? No, but some have them have chosen to decide on which data they request from their upstream site(s). I must add quickly, however, that there are several sites with just your prediciment. >The other problem is the routing to any feed >I have tried is always circuitous. OK. >So it looks like it is decoding correctly. I concur. >Maybe I will get a clean feed tonight and will see for sure. You did, and we did. This makes me breath a sigh of relief. Tom >From address@hidden Sat Apr 29 18:42:46 2000 >Thanks as always for the help! >Robert >NSBF Meteorology
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.