[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

19990618: more os2/mcidas & solarisx server



>From: alan anderson <address@hidden>
>Organization: St. Cloud State
>Keywords: 199906161836.MAA27208 NFS

Alan,

>I may have spoken too soon when saying that our slow data transfer
>problem seemed to have been solved.  I think that we had left the
>os2 machine we were working mounted back on hobbes, while thinking
>we were mounted on waldo.  Hence, it seemed to work at the speed we
>were used to.

This makes more sense to me.

>Another problem appeared today for me.
>
>I can get a listing of an upper air sounding as expected when mounted to
>hobbes using
>       UL LIST 72649 12
>
>The same command on the same machine when it is mounted to waldo gives
>       no sounding available
>
>I looked at the files available on both waldo and hobbes, both have the
>expected MD files (7, 8, 9, 18, 28, 19, 29  on Hobbes) with these plus 
>many more (as expected) on waldo.  the files on waldo are also larger,
>but that is also as expected.  I do not understand why waldo will not 
>give me the sounding list.

I just logged onto waldo as 'mcidas' and did the following:

cd workdata
mdu.k LIST 1 100  - this showed that the MD files are accessible
ul.k LIST 72469 12

 STATION:72469  DAY/TIME:1999169 120000 LAT/LONG:397500  1048665
    LEVEL    TEMP  DEW PT     DIR   SPEED  HEIGHT
    840.0    10.8     8.0   220.0     2.5   1608.0
    818.3    14.1     3.5   255.0     5.1   1829.0
    804.0    16.4     0.4   281.8     5.6   1977.5
    789.1    15.3    -0.2   310.0     6.1   2134.0
    761.0    13.1    -1.3   315.0     6.6   2439.0
    733.9    11.0    -2.4   325.0     8.2   2743.0
    700.0     8.2    -3.8   335.0    10.8   3139.2
    681.7     6.3    -4.6   340.0    12.8   3353.0
    656.4     3.7    -5.7   335.0    13.8   3658.0
    608.7    -1.6    -7.9   320.0    18.0   4268.0
    586.1    -4.2    -9.0   315.0    21.6   4573.0
    584.0    -4.5    -9.1   315.5    21.4   4602.5
    566.0    -6.1   -13.1   319.5    19.7   4848.6
    563.9    -6.3   -13.1   320.0    19.5   4878.0
    523.0   -11.3   -13.1   307.4    17.6   5461.8
    500.0   -11.7   -17.7   300.0    16.4   5807.1
    481.4   -12.0   -23.2   300.0    12.3   6097.0
    475.0   -12.1   -25.1   301.7    10.6   6200.1
    462.4   -13.8   -26.3   305.0     7.2   6402.0
    400.0   -22.9   -32.9   315.0    10.8   7488.0
    392.7   -24.1   -33.7   315.0    11.3   7621.0
    345.0   -32.3   -39.3   305.8    13.2   8552.6
    316.8   -36.6   -48.5   300.0    14.4   9146.0
    300.0   -39.3   -54.3   305.0    13.8   9524.7
    264.7   -45.9   -56.8   285.0    14.9  10365.0
    252.9   -48.3   -57.7   280.0    15.9  10670.0
    250.0   -48.9   -57.9   280.0    15.9  10748.4
    241.0   -50.9   -58.9   280.0    19.4  10988.3
    230.4   -51.6   -61.6   280.0    23.6  11280.0
    200.0   -53.9   -69.9   280.0    21.0  12194.5
    199.0   -53.7   -70.7   279.7    20.9  12226.7
    150.0   -60.5   -83.5   265.0    15.4  14016.2
    148.0   -60.7   -83.7   262.3    15.0  14099.8
    142.7   -59.5   -83.3   255.0    13.8  14329.0
    142.0   -59.3   -83.3   255.5    13.7  14358.3
 ...

So, from the 'mcidas' account on waldo the data is accessible with no
problems.  The question is why it is not accessible from your OS/2
machine when it has waldo's data disk mounted.  I would suspect that
the REDIRECTions in place when waldo's disk is mounted are incorrect.

>After the above, I stopped.  Image transfers from waldo work, but are slow,
>not sure they are as slow as last week.  I guess I will get a stop watch 
>and measure before doing any more. 

Try doing an image load off of waldo using ADDE.  On your slow OS/2 machine
do the following:

DATALOC ADD RTIMAGES WALDO.STCLOUDSTATE.EDU
IMGDISP RTIMAGES/GW-VIS STA=KSTC EU=IMAGE MAG=2

It will be illustrative to compare loading an image accessed by NFS with
one by ADDE transfers.

Tom


NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.