[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[LDM #KYZ-560013]: pqact.conf questions



Tiros,

> We only use one active pqact.conf each time to test the lightning decoder.

And only one EXEC entry for pqact(1) in the LDM configuration-file?

> Attached are the pqact.confs we used for case1 (two entries) and case2 (all
> entries).  Also attached are the output of the lightning plots from 16Z and
> 19Z for dev and production runs.  The 16Z dev plots use pqact.conf_case2
> and 19Z plots use pqact.conf_case1.  The production is the "ground true"
> for the test.
> 
> prod_16Z.png  16Z production
> dev_16Z.png   16Z dev (using pqact.conf_case2)
> prod_19Z.png  19Z production
> dev_19Z.png    19Z dev (use pqact.conf_case1)
> 
> It is evident that the 16Z dev plot (with all pqact.conf entries) is not
> even close to the operation plot.   19Z plots look ok.

Is the problem the fact that the "dev"s don't match the "prod"s or that case1 
doesn't match case2?

> btw, we were told by the Data Flow group that our LDM development queue may
> not large enough and products may get thrown out.  Could that be the root
> cause?

Could be. Check the LDM log file on the "dev" system. Does it contain any 
"Processed oldest product" messages from the pqact(1) process?

Regards,
Steve Emmerson

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: KYZ-560013
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed
===================
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata 
inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web.  If 
you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must 
let us know in each email you send to us.



NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.