[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[LDM #JVF-237504]: 6.11.4 segfault on RHEL6.4 64bit



Daryl,

So, there might be a bug in LDM 6.11.4.

Rather than re-installing LDM versions, why didn't you change the "runtime" 
symbolic link in the LDM user's home directory?

When you re-installed 6.11.4, did you change any compilation or link options?

And no, this ticket is definitely not closed: it just gets set that way when 
the response ball is in the user's court.

> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Unidata LDM Support wrote:
> 
> > [Sorry for taking so long to respond. I was in an AWIPS-II administration 
> > workshop all week.]
> 
> No need to appologize for helping...
> 
> > Was the LDM version 6.11.4?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > The core-dump indicates that the binary is newer than the core file.
> > This is bad because the stack trace can't, therefore, be trusted.
> 
> The reason was that once LDM crashed, I did a 'make install' on the
> previous version to get me back and running.  I then attempted to run gdb
> and realized I needed 6.11.4 in place for it to work.  So I did 'make
> install' on 6.11.4 , ran gdb , and then did 'make install' again on the
> older version.
> 
> > Is there any chance I could log onto Iem21 as the LDM user?
> 
> Sorry, that won't work.
> 
> > Ticket ID: JVF-237504
> > Department: Support LDM
> > Priority: High
> > Status: Closed
> 
> Is this ticket really closed?
> 
> daryl
> 
> --
> /**
> * Daryl Herzmann
> * Assistant Scientist -- Iowa Environmental Mesonet
> * http://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu
> */
> 
> 

Regards,
Steve Emmerson

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: JVF-237504
Department: Support LDM
Priority: High
Status: Closed


NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.