[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

20050805: LDM 6.4.1 compile problem on Solaris using gcc 3.4 (cont.)



>From: "Magee, David" <address@hidden>
>Organization: Navy
>Keywords: 200508032032.j73KW4jo024589 LDM 6.4.1 compile

Hi David,

>     Well, that went up in flames.  :)

Rats :-(

>During the configure:
>
>hecking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
>checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed

This may be telling us that adding the "-std=c89" flag to gcc compiles
is not needed.  I'm sorry I didn't catch this in log file you sent
in earlier.

>checking the C compiler... works
>configure: Checking how to maximize the (long, void*, off_t) programming
>environment
>checking if the system supports _XBS5_LPBIG_OFFBIG... yes
>configure: -U_MAPRGNS
>configure: cflags="-xarch=v9"
>configure: ldflags="-xarch=v9"
>configure: libs=""
>configure: ARFLAGS="-cru"
>checking the C compiler (again)... configure: error: gcc failed to compile
>test code
>See `config.log' for more details.
>bash-2.05$ 
>
>
>
>From the config.log
>
>configure:2216: -U_MAPRGNS
>configure:2218: cflags="-xarch=v9"
>configure:2220: ldflags="-xarch=v9"
>configure:2222: libs=""
>configure:2224: ARFLAGS="-cru"
>configure:2226: checking the C compiler (again)
>configure:2232: gcc -c -std=c89 -xarch=v9  conftest.c >&5
>gcc: language arch=v9 not recognized
>gcc: conftest.c: linker input file unused because linking not done
>configure:2238: $? = 0
>configure:2242: test -z 
>                         || test ! -s conftest.err
>configure:2245: $? = 0
>configure:2248: test -s conftest.o
>configure:2251: $? = 1
>configure: failed program was:
>| int foo;
>configure:2260: error: gcc failed to compile test code
>See `config.log' for more details.
>
>## ---------------- ##
>## Cache variables. ##
>## ---------------- ##
>
>The arch=v9 not recognized is interesting - that's refering to Solaris, 
>I think.  

Yes, it a Solaris flag that indicates the desire to build 64-bit
executables.

>I tried to send an e-mail to ldm-users about this, and I don't think it went
>out.

I saw it, so it did go out.  Let me confer with others here at the UPC
to see if we can come up with something.  I will also forward your
original message to our LDM developer just in case he gets the opportunity
of reading his email while on travel.

>I just subscribed from address@hidden, but I didn't see my e-mail
>show up on the list.
>
>Any ideas on that one?

Another site subscribed to multiple Unidata email lists from a
gmail account also reported that he wasn't seeing any messages on
from the lists.  We reviewed our sendmail logs and verified that
mail was being forwarded/sent to his gmail account, so we concluded
that gmail was blocking the messages.

>Many thanks for your help!

I will get back to you after we confer on your problem.

Cheers,

Tom
--
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the
Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available
through the web.  If you do not want to have your interactions made
available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.


NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.