[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ldm upgrade...acting odd



Gabe,

>Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:27:03 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Gabe Langbauer <address@hidden>
>Organization: UCAR/Unidata
>To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: ldm upgrade...acting odd 

The above message contained the following:

> address@hidden ldm]$ grep pqact /usr/local/ldm/etc/ldmd.conf
> exec    "pqact"

Good.

> address@hidden ldm]$ ls -lLi /usr/local/ldm/bin/pqact 
> /usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.1.0/bin /pqact /usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.3.0/bin/pqact
> 21823551 -rwxr-xr-x    1 ldm      unidata     93077 Jun 14 10:19 
> /usr/local/ldm/bin/pqact
>  2343015 -rwxr-xr-x    1 ldm      unidata     88312 Dec  7  2004 
> /usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.1.0/bin/pqact
> 21823551 -rwxr-xr-x    1 ldm      unidata     93077 Jun 14 10:19 
> /usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.3.0/bin/pqact

The above indicates that the default pqact(1) is the version 6.3.0
one, and that that version differs from version 6.1.0 of pqact(1).

When combined with the output from the "ldmadmin confg" command (most
notably the value of the PATH environment variable) and the symbolic
links in the LDM user's home directory, the above should guarantee that
version 6.3.0 of pqact(1) will be executed by the LDM server.  Your
assertion that version 6.1.0 of pqact(1) is, instead, executed indicates
that a faulty assumption has been made.

Assumptions I made:

    The outputs you sent me were from commands executed by the LDM user.

    The LDM user's home directory is /usr/local/ldm.

    You restarted the LDM after making the changes.

    Only one LDM is running.

Are these assumptions all good?

Regards,
Steve Emmerson


NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.