Gabe, >Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:27:03 -0400 (EDT) >From: Gabe Langbauer <address@hidden> >Organization: UCAR/Unidata >To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden> >Subject: Re: ldm upgrade...acting odd The above message contained the following: > address@hidden ldm]$ grep pqact /usr/local/ldm/etc/ldmd.conf > exec "pqact" Good. > address@hidden ldm]$ ls -lLi /usr/local/ldm/bin/pqact > /usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.1.0/bin /pqact /usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.3.0/bin/pqact > 21823551 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ldm unidata 93077 Jun 14 10:19 > /usr/local/ldm/bin/pqact > 2343015 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ldm unidata 88312 Dec 7 2004 > /usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.1.0/bin/pqact > 21823551 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ldm unidata 93077 Jun 14 10:19 > /usr/local/ldm/ldm-6.3.0/bin/pqact The above indicates that the default pqact(1) is the version 6.3.0 one, and that that version differs from version 6.1.0 of pqact(1). When combined with the output from the "ldmadmin confg" command (most notably the value of the PATH environment variable) and the symbolic links in the LDM user's home directory, the above should guarantee that version 6.3.0 of pqact(1) will be executed by the LDM server. Your assertion that version 6.1.0 of pqact(1) is, instead, executed indicates that a faulty assumption has been made. Assumptions I made: The outputs you sent me were from commands executed by the LDM user. The LDM user's home directory is /usr/local/ldm. You restarted the LDM after making the changes. Only one LDM is running. Are these assumptions all good? Regards, Steve Emmerson
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.