[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

20040929: ldm 6.1 - change in "-m" behavior



Harry,

>Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:21:43 -0700
>From: Harry Edmon <address@hidden>
>Organization: University of Washington
>To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: 20040929: ldm 6.1 - change in "-m" behavior
> Keywords: 200409282351.i8SNpxHP002118 LDM 6.1

The above message contained the following:

> I understand this - but with a completely empty queue at the start of 
> the LDM, shouldn't all the feeds be requesting data 3 hours old?  It has 
> in the past, but not with 6.1.

I understand your question now.

That is puzzling.  The following lines from your previous email exemplify
the conundrum:

    Sep 28 23:39:47 freshair rpc.ldmd[3117]: Starting Up (version: 6.1.0; 
built: Sep 17 2004 13:51:28)
    ...
    Sep 28 23:39:47 freshair thelma[3139]: Starting Up(6.1.0): thelma.ucar.edu: 
TS_ZERO TS_ENDT {{CONDUIT,  "[45]$"}}
    Sep 28 23:39:47 freshair unidata2[3140]: Starting Up(6.1.0): 
unidata2.ssec.wisc.edu: TS_ZERO TS_ENDT {{UNIWISC,  ".*"}}
    ...
    Sep 28 23:39:48 freshair thelma[3139]: Desired product class: 
20040928203948.515 TS_ENDT {{CONDUIT,  "[45]$"}}
    Sep 28 23:39:48 freshair unidata2[3140]: Desired product class: 
20040928233948.266 TS_ENDT {{UNIWISC,  ".*"}}

I'll investigate.

Are you sure the product-queue was empty?  Was anything other than the 
LDM processes putting data-products into the product-queue?

Regards,
Steve Emmerson


NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.