[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

20030226:ASU thelma feed

Hi Nancy, 

Sounds like a plan...

I suspect that splitting the request would have the same positive benefits
from nimbus, but we can try that after we get a better picture of your
feed from thelma..

Cheers,

-Jeff
____________________________                  _____________________
Jeff Weber                                    address@hidden
Unidata Support                               PH:303-497-8676 
COMET Case Study Library                      FX:303-497-8690
University Corp for Atmospheric Research      3300 Mitchell Ln
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber      Boulder,Co 80307-3000
________________________________________      ______________________

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Nancy Selover wrote:

> Jeff,
>   I will remove the mcidas feed request line this afternoon.  I would like
> to stay with thelma at least through tomorrow as we found our worst problems
> on data losses occurred starting around 7am local time, and lasted through
> the day until about 5-6 pm local time.
>       Right now the latencies and number of products look way better than
> they have on nimbus.
> 
> Nancy
> 
> Nancy J. Selover
> Asst. State Climatologist
> Office of Climatology           tel:  480-965-0580
> Arizona State University      fax: 480-965-1473
> Tempe, AZ  85287-1508      e-mail: address@hidden
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Weber [mailto:address@hidden]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:30 PM
> To: Nancy Selover
> Cc: ldm-support
> Subject: Re: thelma feed
> 
> 
> Hi Nancy, 
> 
> This is all good, I do not suspect a corrupt queue, otherwise you would
> not be seeing any data..We have gotten some 18Z sat imagery so I know it
> is out there. 
> 
> Are your latencies improved coming from thelma than from the nimbus feed?
> 
> I think you will see improved performance from nimbus as well with the
> request seperation.
> 
> Lets keep feeding from thelma for awhile and see if things calm down and
> your latencies inprove..sometimes bringing the ldm up and down can slow
> the queue process, so if we let the ldm get to a stable state..a few
> hours..we can properly diagnose..
> 
> Please keep me posted, we should have this cleared up by end of day..
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -Jeff
> ____________________________                  _____________________
> Jeff Weber                                    address@hidden
> Unidata Support                               PH:303-497-8676 
> COMET Case Study Library                      FX:303-497-8690
> University Corp for Atmospheric Research      3300 Mitchell Ln
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber      Boulder,Co 80307-3000
> ________________________________________      ______________________
> 
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Nancy Selover wrote:
> 
> > Jeff,
> >   It appears that the 3 separate lines are working.  I got the 18Z surface
> > data from Metar, and I got one RUC 1700 Z model update.  I haven't gotten
> > the 1715 or 1815 satellite imagery, although the notify me says I can get
> > MCIDAS.  Could it be a problem with my queue.  I would think I would get
> > whatever is most recent within an hour.  Also, my log file looks better,
> it
> > is continuous.  Before it just exited and that was it.
> > 
> > Nancy
> > 
> 
> 
>