[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: your mail

Hi Chris, 

Yes, ldmping is a nice utility, traceroute gives a nice snaphot, MTR
(Matt's traceroute) is an open source program, can be found easily with a
a search if not already installed, and it is a dynamic traceroute giving
reports back every 5 seconds (default can be modified)....

And looking at I2 and vBNS routing maps..

I would try San Jose State, U of A, Utah, UCAR, San Diego...

Let me know if I can help further,

-Jeff
____________________________                  _____________________
Jeff Weber                                    address@hidden
Unidata Support                               PH:303-497-8676 
COMET Case Study Library                      FX:303-497-8690
University Corp for Atmospheric Research      3300 Mitchell Ln
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber      Boulder,Co 80307-3000
________________________________________      ______________________

On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Chris Herbster wrote:

> What is the standard way to test for the best site to feed from?
> 
> Could you suggest a few sites for Curtis to check (ldmping?)?
> 
> Thanks Jeff,
> 
> CH
> 
> Jeff Weber wrote:
> 
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > We will do all we can to fill in the gaps from Florida, either from Utah,
> > U of A, or UCAR..Keep us posted and we will work with you.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > -Jeff
> > ____________________________                  _____________________
> > Jeff Weber                                    address@hidden
> > Unidata Support                               PH:303-497-8676
> > COMET Case Study Library                      FX:303-497-8690
> > University Corp for Atmospheric Research      3300 Mitchell Ln
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber      Boulder,Co 80307-3000
> > ________________________________________      ______________________
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Unidata Support wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Subject:20021013:rescott network access for weather data
> > > Reply-to: Chris Herbster <address@hidden>
> > > --------
> > >
> > > ------- Forwarded Message
> > >
> > > >To: Ernst Schuppe <address@hidden>
> > > >cc: Brent Ellzey <address@hidden>,
> > > >cc: Jim Kress <address@hidden>,
> > > >cc: "creechd@erau. edu" <address@hidden>,
> > > >cc: Cindy Bixler <address@hidden>,
> > > >cc: Curtis James <address@hidden>,
> > > >cc: Mark Sinclair <address@hidden>,
> > > >cc: Unidata Support <address@hidden>
> > > >From: Chris Herbster <address@hidden>
> > > >Subject: Re: Prescott network access for weather data
> > > >Organization: Embry-Riddle University
> > > >Keywords: 200210141451.g9EEpO100716
> > >
> > > Ernst (et al.),
> > >
> > > Curtis James and I had hoped to open the faucet between campuses this
> > > past summer, but with all that has gone on in each of our worlds we
> > > never got to that point.  We are basically poised to try, I think.
> > >
> > > On this end we will be accepting delivery of our satellite (NOAAPORT)
> > > data feed (i.e. have things installed).  This is scheduled to happen on
> > > Oct 30/31.(!!)
> > >
> > > I'm not ready to make any tests of changes to the way we are doing
> > > things until after that event passes.  I have other changes that I need
> > > to make on this end to get ready for the new system (i.e. fire hose of
> > > data).
> > >
> > > Let's work for some kind of scheduled tests for November (if possible),
> > > but with an understanding that our teaching loads may interfere with
> > > this plan.
> > >
> > > In the meanwhile, Curtis and Mark, please put together your minimum
> > > product list.  We are getting a two channel system.  One channel is the
> > > NWSTG (National Weather Service telecom. gateway) and is all the text,
> > > observations, model, radar and any other non-satellite data types.  The
> > > second channel we'll be getting is the "GOES-East" channel, which I
> > > understand also has a limited selection of GOES-West images.
> > >
> > > It is also possible for the Prescott campus to get data either from us,
> > > or a topologically closer (on the Internet) feed from the traditional
> > > Unidata IDD (Internet Data Delivery) system.  (This is how we've been
> > > doing business up to our getting the NOAAPORT.)  One possible solution
> > > might be Utah or another "big" provider in the IDD.  We could still
> > > provide things that they can't get elsewhere.
> > >
> > > We are getting (different types of) data from a couple of different
> > > upstream sources using the IDD.
> > >
> > > Hopefully this will give you time to work out problems without us, and
> > > us time to estimate what the data load will be.
> > >
> > > In addition to Curtis and Mark at Prescott, I've included the Support
> > > alias at Unidata as they might have some suggestions for IDD feed
> > > sources given your new bandwidth capabilities out in Az.
> > >
> > > We'll work on the details and get back to you as soon as we can.
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers all,
> > >
> > > Chris H.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ernst Schuppe wrote:
> > >
> > > > Chris,
> > > >
> > > > We moved all Prescott network traffic off the 256K frame circuit this
> > > > morning.  We consider this phase of the process a test phase.  Prescott 
> > > > has
> > > > installed a 9Mb/s fractional DS3. If I recall correctly, you had the 
> > > > desire
> > > > to run some preliminary tests with Prescott transfering weather data.
> > > > Since I need the blessing of Brent Ellzey (Prescott's network engineer 
> > > > who
> > > > is cc'd here), I'd like to ask you to review your short and long term 
> > > > goals
> > > > for all the interested parties.  Any estimates of traffic loads would 
> > > > also
> > > > be appreciated, along with any specific IP addresses that will be 
> > > > involved
> > > > at both ends.
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > Ernst
> > >
> > >
> > > ------- End of Forwarded Message
> > >
> > >
> 
>