[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Data latencies: could much of this be avoided? (fwd)


===============================================================================
Robb Kambic                                Unidata Program Center
Software Engineer III                      Univ. Corp for Atmospheric Research
address@hidden             WWW: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/
===============================================================================

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 12:09:34 -0600 (CST)
From: Gilbert Sebenste <address@hidden>
To: C. Vandersip <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Data latencies: could much of this be avoided?

Oops, I sent that out a little early. That doesn't guarantee that all
latenices will go away, but it should improve the situation. If you
re-started your LDM after you did it, you should notice less of a delay
with IDS|DDPLUS than with HDS.

*******************************************************************************
Gilbert Sebenste                                                     ********
Internet: address@hidden    (My opinions only!)                     ******
Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University                      ****
E-mail: address@hidden                                 ***
web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu                                      **
Work phone: 815-753-5492                                                *
*******************************************************************************