[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

20020918: 20020918: GEMPAK 5.6.h problem

Brian,

The restore parameters you sent me had a bunch of HTML junk
that I had to clean up, which I assumed was from your mailer.
That is, all the =20 characters imbeded at the line ends.
The one line that had something different was the LINE
parameter, which in the message you sent looked like:
<P>LINE 32=3Dg05/1/1!4/1/1 </P>

I changed this to
LINE   32/1/1!4/1/1

You should probably see if there is some imbedded control character there
in your file, perhaps delete the line and retype it. It just seems that
your mailer found something there that definitely shouldn't be there.

Steve Chiswell

>From: "Brian Bernard" <address@hidden>
>Organization: UCAR/Unidata
>Keywords: 200209190304.g8J34D104414

>Hi Steve,
>
>Yes, I had downloaded 5.6.h prior to September 16th, but when you announced
>the release I grabbed the new version and installed it. I looked in
>$GEMEME/* and the files are dated September 15th with a timestamp of 19:33,
>19:34, etc. This is strange because all my other restore files work with
>absolutely no problems, but the one I sent you causes problems.
>
>Regards,
>
>Brian Bernard
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Unidata Support" <address@hidden>
>To: "Brian Bernard" <address@hidden>
>Cc: <address@hidden>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 5:29 PM
>Subject: 20020918: GEMPAK 5.6.h problem
>
>
>>
>> Brian,
>>
>> Did you download 5.6.h prior to Sept 16 when I made the release
>> announcement? This sounds like an ntl 24 bit Linux bug in the preview
>> release that I fixed before making the final release.
>>
>> If you downloaded the binary release, you should make sure that the
>> $GEMEXE/* file times are Sept 15th and later.
>>
>> The nts restore file you sent works for me.
>>
>> Steve Chiswell
>> Unidata User Support
>>
>>
>