[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Support #TYK-101297]: Long idle times for processes under LDM 6.7.0.3?
- To: sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Support #TYK-101297]: Long idle times for processes under LDM 6.7.0.3?
- From: "Unidata LDM Support" <support-ldm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:04:53 -0600
- Delivered-to: support-ldm@unidata.ucar.edu by laraine.unidata.ucar.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F24CB187; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:04:53 -0600 (MDT) id 4C373D4FBA; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:04:53 -0600 (MDT)
Gilbert,
> ps ax:
>
> 31829 ? S 116:33 /home/ldm/bin/pqact -f FNEXRAD|FSL2|IDS|DDPLUS|NLDN|N
> 31830 ? S 238:06 /home/ldm/bin/pqact -f FSL2|NNEXRAD|NLDN|WMO|WSI /hom
> 31831 ? S 144:45 /home/ldm/bin/pqact -f NEXRAD2 -p BZIP2/K[A-D]
> /home/
> 31833 ? S 137:02 /home/ldm/bin/pqact -f NEXRAD2 -p BZIP2/K[E-K]
> /home/
> 31834 ? S 144:18 /home/ldm/bin/pqact -f NEXRAD2 -p BZIP2/K[L-R]
> /home/
> 31836 ? S 108:32 /home/ldm/bin/pqact -f NEXRAD2 -p BZIP2/K[S-Z]
> /home/
> 31837 ? S 100:31 /home/ldm/bin/pqsurf -Q /dev/shm/pqsurf.pq
>
> These processes seem to be "idle", and yet they are working. Never noticed
> them with this long of an idle time before. Whassssssap with that? :-)
According to the ps(1) man-page on my Linux system, the times are the
accumulated CPU times and not the idle times.
> *******************************************************************************
> Gilbert Sebenste ********
> (My opinions only!) ******
> Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University ****
> E-mail: sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ***
> web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu **
> *******************************************************************************
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: TYK-101297
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed
