[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

20031016: LDM 6.0.14 connection to portmap on RedHat 9

Rita,

>Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:55:14 -0500
>From: Rita Edwards <address@hidden>
>Organization: NASA/Marshal Space Flight Center
>To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: 20031016: LDM 6.0.14 connection to portmap on RedHat 9

The above message contained the following:

> As a side note, looking at the src/protocol directory.  The pointer
> name has been changed in the ldm.h.  Is there a possibility that the 
> old pointer name is causing issues?
>
> 182% diff ldm.h.6013 ldm.h
> 382c382
> <       prod_class *class;
> ---
> >       prod_class *prod_class;
> 516c516
> <               prod_class *class;
> ---
> >               prod_class *prod_class;

That won't affect anything as long as the LDM on Branch was built from
scratch.

> Diffing between the versions, there are some differences with
> ldm5_clnt.c, but they appear to be only spacing issues and comments.  
> 
> However, there are major modifications with
> the ldm_clnt.c.  I am not familiar with this code, and could
> be way off base here!  In truth, I need to run gdiff with the
> code to line it up and compare, but I don't have that on
> this system...sigh...
> 
> Could really use some insight on what I am missing here,
> Thanks for the help,

I just ran a version 6.0.14 LDM on a RedHat 9 system that's outside our
coporate firewall and successfully connected-to and received data from
an LDM 6.0.14 running inside our corporate firewall -- so I don't think
RedHat 9 is the problem.

> Rita
> -- 
> **************************************************************************
> Rita R. Edwards                            * 
> Global Hydrology and Climate Center        * I've had prayers answered,
> National Space Science & Technology Center * now I am careful what I ask
> 320 Sparkman Drive Huntsville, Al 35805    * for. 
> (256)961-7873 Pager:(256)544-1183 1157     *

Regards,
Steve Emmerson