Hi Bill,
Yeah, at first, I also thought that it was an interference pattern, but
zooming in (up to the point they disappear from being zoomed too far), I
get this:
http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross/VCPRPE/VisADSamples/Alpha_Pattern_newJava_zoom.gif
For reference, this is roughly above the highest "peak" in the jagged
white line at the bottom of:
http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross/VCPRPE/VisADSamples/Alpha_Pattern_newJava.gif
It is where the first (bottom) purple wedge overlays the 2nd (from
bottom) yellow wedge.
Yes, the section of code that produces this plot are identical between
the two examples. The only difference is the java APIs.
Also, when testing this on different machines - notably with the newer
java(2/3) APIs - I get the same pattern.
Thanks!
-kevin.
Bill Hibbard wrote:
Hi Kevin,
The pattern in your second image looks like interference
between the screen pixel dot pattern and the pattern of
your data displayed as discrete points. If you zoom in,
you should see the purple areas become discrete points.
Please let me know what happens when you zoom way into
both your first and second images.
Are they generated using identical application code and
data?
I searched our CVS log for changes that might affect whether
an IrregularSet is displayd as filled triangles or discrete
points, and couldn't find any (but of course I may have
missed the change).
--
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Kevin L. Manross [KD5MYD] <>< (405)-366-0557
CIMMS Research Associate kevin.manross@xxxxxxxx
[NSSL-WRDD/SWATN] http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross
"My opinions are my own and not representative of CIMMS, NSSL,
NOAA or any affiliates"
+------------------------------------------------------------+
