Once again, Don, you save the day!
Higher Resolution:
http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross/VCPRPE/KIWA-hiResAP.gif
Lower Resolution:
http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross/VCPRPE/KIWA-lowResAP.gif
"Resolution" is defined by A) the number of points along the radial line
and B) the number of radials sampled per degree azimuth.
Now, is there a way to connect the dots so that I have several discrete
2D "blobs" instead of rows of points? I.e., from the above examples,
you can make out 2D features that basically indicate mountain tops.
Thanks again!
-kevin.
Don Murray wrote:
Kevin-
Do you want to just plot points where the intersections occur?
If so, then just create a FieldImpl of your points as:
(index -> (lat,lon)
The Gridded2DSet would indicate that there is some relation betwee
all the points. On a 1D manifold, this would be a line (like your
selector line) and on a 2D manifold, this would be a grid. As just
points in a FieldImpl, they should just show up as points. Since
they will be discontinous, this seems like a good approach. You could
use a ConstantMap to PointSize to set the size of the points.
Another approach would be to use the same Gridded2DSet that is your
domain of the PPI panel and create a FieldImpl of
(lat,lon) -> (value)
where value would be some number (not NaN) at the set indexes where
the intersection occurs and NaN everywhere else. Map value to
RGB and it would give you a color map of the intersection points.
you could use valueToIndex with your array of lat/lons to figure
out which points should be NaN and which should have a value.
I hope that is clear, but am certainly willing to explain further if
needed.
--
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Kevin L. Manross [KD5MYD] (405)-366-0557
CIMMS Research Associate kevin.manross@xxxxxxxx
[NSSL-WRDD/SWATN] http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross
"My opinions are my own and not representative of CIMMS, NSSL,
NOAA or any affiliates"
+------------------------------------------------------------+
