Hi,
I am trying to build netcdf 3.6.2 on both a Red Hat 5 64 bit platform,
and on a CentOS 32 bit system. The configure runs fine, but when I try
to do the "make" I get the following errors:
$ make
cd .
&& /bin/sh /perforce/stgagg/DATARC/thirdparty/netcdf/rel/netcdf-3.6.2/missing
--run automake-1.9 --foreign
man/Makefile.am:155: user target `netcdf.html' defined here...
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/texibuild.am: ... overrides Automake target
`netcdf.html' defined here
man/Makefile.am:159: user target `netcdf-install.html' defined here...
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/texibuild.am: ... overrides Automake target
`netcdf-install.html' defined here
man/Makefile.am:163: user target `netcdf-c.html' defined here...
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/texibuild.am: ... overrides Automake target
`netcdf-c.html' defined here
man/Makefile.am:179: user target `netcdf-tutorial.html' defined here...
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/texibuild.am: ... overrides Automake target
`netcdf-tutorial.html' defined here
man/Makefile.am:167: user target `netcdf-f77.html' defined here...
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/texibuild.am: ... overrides Automake target
`netcdf-f77.html' defined here
man/Makefile.am:175: user target `netcdf-f90.html' defined here...
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/texibuild.am: ... overrides Automake target
`netcdf-f90.html' defined here
man/Makefile.am:171: user target `netcdf-cxx.html' defined here...
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/texibuild.am: ... overrides Automake target
`netcdf-cxx.html' defined here
man/Makefile.am:61: user variable `TEXI2DVI' defined here...
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/texinfos.am: ... overrides Automake variable
`TEXI2DVI' defined here
man/Makefile.am:73: `doc_DATA' is used but `docdir' is undefined
make: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1
I have checked within the Makefile, and its aborting on the ./missing
--run automake-1.9 assignment. I can reproduce the errors by simply
typing automake in the same directory as where I did the make command.
I've googled for help, but can't seem to find anything addressing this.
Can someone help?
Thanks,
Doug
