"Timothy Hume" <T.Hume@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Does this have any implications for future versions of NetCDF? That is, it
> would seem that the F77 API will still need to be supported in order for the
> F90 API to work; or will there be a new version of the F90 API which does not
> rely on F77?
> Tim Hume
> Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research
There is no plan to drop the F77 API.
Eventually we would like to switch to a better way of supporting
fortran, but we will keep the API working in any case...
Ed Hartnett -- ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx