Re: compiling netcdf

Warren Turkal <wt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thursday 05 April 2007 15:36, Ed Hartnett wrote:
>> Nope. Is there some reason that it should?
>
> Well, I don't know if it should be default, but it enables to a different 
> memory model that may be useful for large datasets. I am not familiar enough 
> with how NetCDF works to make a really educated assessment. I have a user 
> that is having a hard time stuffing a very large dataset into NetCDF, and I 
> think it may have something to do with this limitation. I may be way off base 
> though.
>
>> The general idea is that if there are any flags that need to be set
>> for your compiler, you must set them.
>
> This seems reasonable.
>
>> The exception is that the netCDF configure does set the correct flag
>> to allow the fortran wrapper functions to work (if it can figure that
>> out from the name of your fortran compiler).
>
> Again, reasonable.
>
> Thanks,
> wt
> -- 
> Warren Turkal
>

Is your user using 64-bit offset format?

It's explained here:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/netcdf/Large-File-Support.html#Large-File-Support

-- 
Ed Hartnett  -- ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

==============================================================================
To unsubscribe netcdfgroup, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing-list-delete-form.html
==============================================================================