[ldm-users] Fedora 7 redux: BUSTED!
Gilbert Sebenste
sebenste at weather.admin.niu.edu
Mon Oct 15 09:53:31 MDT 2007
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Gerry Creager wrote:
> My preference has proven to be to distribute loads and use separate systems
> for hard-core processing. LDM can be memory intensive.
I do too; I use 3 machines to do all the grunt work. And this go-around, I
made sure I had a minimum of 4 GB of RAM.
> Since I do a lot of
> relaying here, too, I dedicate one system (really two... long story) to that,
> and then have several others filing, processing, etc. I don't recall if we
> went to SATA-II. Since losing my sys admin and taking on those duties, I've
> not gotten into a box to check explicitly, but I thought we had. That said,
> they'd all be on CoRAID systems as we rarely keep more than local system disk
> in machines anymore.
I'm a one-man band myself, as I suspect many of us are here. That means I
have to have something that works quickly out of the box, that I know how
to deal with, and be reliable. And cheap! Of my 9 years with Redhat Linux
(and 7 issuances of their Fedora release), I feel guilty sometimes using
it. I do report bugs, but haven't paid a dime. To say that I have "gotten
my money's worth" is an understatement.
> Think SAS rather than conventional SCSI. We've started migrating to that for
> our RAID shelves and some of the Sun servers (running Centos) we have.
I reveal my ignorance here by asking what is SAS? Looked it up on
Google ("SAS storage"). Then I hit Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_Attached_SCSI
It supports speeds of up to 3 gb/sec, but that's what SATA 2 does. It does
say it will support speeds of 12 gb/sec by 2012, but for now, I don't see
an advantage.
*******************************************************************************
Gilbert Sebenste ********
(My opinions only!) ******
Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University ****
E-mail: sebenste at weather.admin.niu.edu ***
web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu **
*******************************************************************************
More information about the ldm-users
mailing list