As you probably have seen by now...

Gerry Creager gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Thu May 31 20:49:15 MDT 2007


Just had a chance to look at one of the systems here (where I'm most 
concerned with DDS|IDS, and we're not seeing the problem here, either. 
(sasquatch.tamu.edu)

Interesting problem.  I hate tracking them when they don't fail the same 
on all systems...

gerry

Pete Pokrandt wrote:
> Steve Emmerson wrote:
>> Everyone,
>>
>> I'm working on the problem.
>>
>> --Steve Emmerson
> Steve (and others)
> 
> For what it's worth, I've got two 6.6.3 machines here at UW-Madison (f5 
> and weather.aos.wisc.edu) that are NOT exhibiting this problem. All of 
> my data so far as I can tell are being filed with the correct date. For 
> example
> 
> DDS|IDS ^S[AP].* .... ([0-3][0-9])([0-2][0-9])  FILE    
> /usr/local/ldm/data/weather/(\1:yy)(\1:mm)\1\2.METAR
> is filing correctly.
> 
> One is a Centos 4.4 x86_64 box and the other is a Red Hat Enterprise 
> Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 8)
> Let me know if you'd like more details, or access to poke around.
> 
> Pete
> 
>>
>> Daryl Herzmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 May 2007, Harry Edmon wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am not seeing this.  Are they being filed as 20070631, 20070701, 
>>>> or what?
>>>
>>> 20070631 , it is happening here too with LDM 6.6.4 :(
>>>
>>> daryl
>>>
-- 
Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University	
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843




More information about the ldm-users mailing list