[galeon] GALEON-related discussion at the IOOS-DMAC meetings

NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.

Hi,

At the US IOOS (Intgrated Oceans Observing System) DMAC (Data Management and
Communications Subsystem) Steering Team meetings last week, a topic with
important GALEON implications came up.  Please note up front that this is
all very tentative at the moment and very much in the "investigation" stage.
 But, with the next OGC Technical Committee meeting coming up in June, we
should begin considering the pros and cons and other implications.

David Arctur of the OGC suggested that we submit the CF-netCDF directly as
an OGC standard.  As I understood his suggestion, the general idea would be
that CF and netCDF would be for binary data what GML and XML is for text
data.  To me this was a very innovative (if not radical) suggestion and
questions arise whether this would involve the file format, the API, ncML,
ncML-GML, CSML and possibly other facets related to CF-netCDF.  In spite of
the question marks, I think this is really worth some careful thought.
 Since the concept was so new to me, I asked David if there were any
precedents that might serve as a template for how we might proceed.  In
response, he sent a list (appended below without any implied endorsement)
which includes specification examples for file formats and  for the APIs.

Fascinating idea.
.
-- Ben

=============================================

Geographic Objects (GO-1) - this is a fine-grained API pushed by a federal
agency, very little uptake, but it's an API that became an OGC standard.
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/go

KML 2.2 - see what they did.
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/kml

Simple Feature Access, Part 1: Common Architecture - this is an interface
with different platform-specific encodings (COM, CORBA) and SQL access (see
next two references for the most used platforms)
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sfa

Simple Feature Access, Part 2: SQL Option
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sfs

Simple Features for OLE/COM
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sfo

OGC Reference Model (ORM) -- this is the roadmap for OGC standards evolution
and maturation; in your proposal for CF/netCDF describe how it fits in the
roadmap.
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/orm  (pdf & doc downloads from this
page)

Best Practices - index page (includes next two references below)
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/bp

Binary XML (BXML) Encoding Specification, OGC 03-002r9 (Craig Bruce,
CubeWerx)
http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=13636

Specification Best Practices, OGC 06-135r1 (Carl Reed) - This document
describes a variety of Best Practices and Specification development guidance
that the Members have discussed and approved over the years. These Best
Practices have not been captured in other formal OGC documents other than
meeting notes.
http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=17566
  • 2009 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the galeon archives: