[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Handling multiple projections in CF
- To: galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Fwd: Handling multiple projections in CF
- From: "Rich Signell" <rsignell@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 22:08:47 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ISHAWLD/foJ+yAHsIAyA7I8V2UhzHqOyzf09ob8cmJrAzlP/2CX4Au/eSzKeYM5yKBaVOt4rrd8UUV0FAeU1eYtnZVKl+gf8h9jcHSdaXAPkbZ7+7MyVEiImDn7S22HHRj5wQX7xeI8GdO3iAPRWbIKJIhHrhfB85pKV2EaWW7c=
- In-reply-to: <f90afa860612041505q32205365wbd91d33674e453a1@mail.gmail.com>
- Keywords: 200612050308.kB538oXX016752
- Organization: UCAR/Unidata
- References: <61033b870612040626w554d6a31vdc16a8b751d6aa74@mail.gmail.com> <f90afa860612041505q32205365wbd91d33674e453a1@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: owner-galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Galeon Folk,
There has been a lot of discussion lately on the CF group about how to
handle multiple projections in CF.
Basically it's been boiled down to three different possible
approaches, summarized on this wiki page:
http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/wiki/MultipleProjections
Since you folks have experience with both CF and the OGC conventions,
do you see any good reason to pick one over the other (easier to
implement or more similar syntax to OGC conventions, etc)?
Thanks,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard P. Signell (508) 457-2229
USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd.
Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
===============================================================================
To unsubscribe galeon, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing-list-delete-form.html
===============================================================================
